Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Defining subphenotypes for oral clefts based on dental development.

Journal of dental research - 1 Oct 2007

Letra A, Menezes R, Granjeiro J M, Vieira A R

Abstract excerpt

Individuals with clefts present considerably more dental anomalies than do individuals without clefts. We used dental development to subphenotype clefts with the goal of identifying cleft subgroups that could have specific genetic contributions. We examined 1000 individuals, 500 with clefts and 5...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Incisor
Share to Chi-Square Distribution
Share to Child, Preschool

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cleft Lip

Share to Cleft Palate

Share to Odds Ratio

Share to Statistics, Nonparametric

Share to Tooth Abnormalities

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 17890676
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708601013
PMCID: PMC2222667

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-17890676-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Defining subphenotypes for oral clefts based on dental development.PMID 17890676Read ↗

Side of dental anomalies and taurodontism as potential clinical markers for cleft subphenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spectrum of Dental Phenotypes in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Orofacial clefts embryology, classification, epidemiology, and geneticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Dental agenesis: From molecular diagnosis to multidisciplinary managementSemantic proximity Read ↗

Subphenotyping and Classification of Orofacial Clefts: Need for Orofacial Cleft Subphenotyping Calls for Revised Classification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Deep orofacial phenotyping of population-based infants with isolated cleft lip and isolated cleft palate.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dentition Patterns in Different Unilateral Cleft Lip Subphenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence of dental anomalies of number in different subphenotypes of isolated cleft palate.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Expanding the cleft phenotype: the dental characteristics of unaffected parents of Australian children with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A genome-wide association study of third molar agenesis in Japanese and Korean populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining subphenotypes for tooth agenesis: does side matter?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.