Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: field data.

Journal of animal science - 1 Feb 2004

Donoghue K A, Rekaya R, Bertrand J K

Abstract excerpt

The purpose of this study was to compare methods for handling censored days to calving records in beef cattle data, and verify results of an earlier simulation study. Data were records from natural service matings of 33,176 first-calf females in Australian Angus herds. Three methods for handling censored records were evaluated. Censored records (records on noncalving females) were assigned penalty values on a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Computer Simulation

Share to Fertility

Share to Linear Models

Share to Models, Biological

Share to Pregnancy

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 14974531
DOI: 10.2527/2004.822357x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: field data.PMID 14974531Read ↗

Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: simulation study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Threshold-linear analysis of measures of fertility in artificial insemination data and days to calving in beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic evaluation of age at first calving for Guzerá beef cattle using linear, threshold, and survival Bayesian models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic analysis of days from calving to first insemination and days open in Danish Holsteins using different models and censoring scenarios.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Modelling female fertility traits in beef cattle using linear and non-linear models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantifying phenotypic and genetic variation for cow fertility phenotypes in American Simmental using total herd reporting data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic evaluation of age at first calving and days open under different censoring scenarios in Iranian Holstein cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Combining genetic and physiological data to identify predictors of lifetime reproductive success and the effect of selection on these predictors on underlying fertility traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Calving distributions of individual bulls in multiple-sire pastures.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation models and genetic parameters for calving difficulty in beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bayesian estimation in maternally ancestral animal models for weaning weight of beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of threshold vs linear and animal vs sire models for predicting direct and maternal genetic effects on calving difficulty in beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.