Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Use of reproductive technology to estimate variances and predict effects of gene interactions.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Oct 1992

VanRaden P M, Lawlor T J, Short T H, Hoeschele I

Abstract excerpt

Advanced reproductive techniques are creating the large numbers of close relatives needed to study gene interactions. Identical triplets, a set of 26 full sisters, a family of 4215 three-quarter sisters (same sire and maternal grandsire), a family of 76,698 half sisters, and 1.6 million granddaughters of Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation now have lactation records. Similarity of closest relatives might be explained...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cattle
Share to Clone Cells
Share to Embryo Transfer

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Lactation

Share to Mathematics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 1430491
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78051-5

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Use of reproductive technology to estimate variances and predict effects of gene interactions.PMID 1430491Read ↗

Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelbvieh, and Charolais by Method R.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of dominance relationships on the estimation of dominance variance with sire-dam subclass effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid inversion of additive by additive relationship matrices by including sire-dam combination effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for fertility and reproduction traits in North American Holstein cattle using genomic information.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of mom and dad: quantitative genetic models for maternal effects and genomic imprinting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Scalar methods to deregress and split genomic predictions, and associated behavior of simple regressions, for later use in combined prediction and validations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pre-selection against a lethal recessive allele in breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire by dam subclass effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.