Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of 16S rDNA-based PCR and checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridisation for detection of selected endodontic pathogens

1 Dec 2002

Abstract excerpt

Molecular methods have been used recently to investigate the bacteria encountered in human endodontic infections. The aim of the present study was to compare the ability of a 16S rDNA-based PCR assay and checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridisation in detecting Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides forsythus, Peptostreptococcus micros, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Por. gingivalis and Treponema denticola directly...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Share to Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Share to Streptococcal Infections and Treatments

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12466407
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-12-1090

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of 16S rDNA-based PCR and checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridisation for detection of selected endodontic pathogensPMID 12466407Read ↗

A new checkerboard panel for testing bacterial markers in periodontal diseaseSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial Diversity in Persistent Root Canal Infections Investigated by Checkerboard DNA-DNA HybridizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Actinomyces Species, Streptococci, and Enterococcus faecalis in Primary Root Canal InfectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Periodontal pathogens: A quantitative comparison of anaerobic culture and real-time PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of various detection methods for periodontopathic bacteria: can culture be considered the primary reference standard?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular analysis of the root canal microbiota associated with endodontic treatment failuresSemantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of Real‐Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Anaerobic Culture in Detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis: A Meta‐AnalysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular Epidemiology and Association of Putative Pathogens in Root Canal InfectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction versus culture: a comparison between two methods for the detection and quantification of <i>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> and <i>Tannerella forsythensis</i> in subgingival plaque samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Bacteria of asymptomatic periradicular endodontic lesions identified by DNA‐DNA hybridizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct amplification of rRNA gene sequences for identification of selected oral pathogens in root canal infectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12.0pt; text-align: left; mso-line-height-alt: 14.0pt; layout-grid-mode: char; mso-layout-grid-align: none;" align="left">Quantitative Assessment of Primary Colonizer Adhesion on Different Resin-Based Restorative Materials Using SYBR-Green qPCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.