Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups.

Clinical genetics - 1 Sept 2000

Doukas D J, Fetters M D, Coyne J C, McCullough L B

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To determine the values, beliefs, and attitudes that influence a man's intention to undergo or defer genetic testing for prostate cancer risk. DESIGN: Qualitative, using focus group interviews 12 focus groups were conducted to identify key values and beliefs about genetic testing for p...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Attitude to Health
Share to Demography
Share to Education

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Ethnicity

Share to Focus Groups

Share to Health Education

Share to Prostatic Neoplasms

Share to United States

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11076038
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580303.x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-11076038-2026-09-01.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-01.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups.PMID 11076038Read ↗

What tools do men need to make an informed decision about germline genetic testing for prostate cancer? A qualitative and survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Men's values-based factors on prostate cancer risk genetic testing: a telephone survey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The beliefs, and reported and intended behaviors of unaffected men in response to their family history of prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What men want: Qualitative analysis of what men with prostate cancer (PCa) want to learn regarding genetic referral, counseling, and testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Examining risk perception among men with a family history of prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

"It's all very well reading the letters in the genome, but it's a long way to being able to write": Men's interpretations of undergoing genetic profiling to determine future risk of prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“Hope at a Better Chance”: Perspectives on Genetic Counseling and Testing among Black Individuals with Prostate CancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in Australian men: the influence of family history.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The psychological impact of undergoing genetic-risk profiling in men with a family history of prostate cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“Is It Worth Knowing?” Focus Group Participants’ Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.