Planning from a small pilot without treating noise as signal
by Yun O.
Consider a two-arm randomized study with a continuous primary outcome. A small internal pilot provides both the mean difference and standard deviation, but each estimate is imprecise and the planned population may be more heterogeneous. For the definitive study, which effect-size assumption is most defensible: a prespecified clinically meaningful difference paired with an inflated pilot variance, a shrinkage estimate of the standardized pilot effect, or a range of scenarios? If shrinkage is used, what should determine its magnitude?
Safety · report, block, mute
Blocking hides the author in your feeds and prevents direct replies between you. Muting hides a Topic. Public posts remain public.
Crosspost to another Topic
Write your own title and commentary. The original is linked, not copied. To crosspost a crosspost, open its original first.
